US health experts vote against MDMA as treatment for PTSD

A panel of US health experts convened by the Food and Drug Administration on Tuesday overwhelmingly voted against the use of MDMA, commonly known as ecstasy, to treat post-traumatic stress disorder.

PTSD, a debilitating mental health condition that develops after a person experiences or is threatened by traumatic events such as death, combat or sexual assault, affects an estimated five percent of Americans in any given year.

But pharmaceutical treatment options are so far limited to two antidepressants that require three months of dosing to take effect, and response rates to the medications have been found to be uneven.

California-based Lykos Therapeutics has based its request for regulatory approval on two clinical studies, each of which enrolled around 100 people, to evaluate MDMA used together with other psychological interventions such as talk therapy, against a placebo with talk therapy.

These two studies, published in the prestigious journal Nature Medicine, indicated MDMA was indeed both safe and highly effective at treating PTSD.

But nine out of 11 experts on the panel said available data was not enough to show the treatment was effective, and 10 out of 11 said the benefits did not outweigh the risks.

“I think this is a really exciting treatment. I’m really encouraged by the results to date,” said one of the experts, Paul Holtzheimer of the National Center for PTSD.

“But I feel that both from an efficacy and a safety standpoint, it is still premature.”

The vote by the panel of experts is non-binding, but the FDA rarely goes against their recommendations.

MDMA—methylenedioxymethamphetamine—is a Schedule 1 drug under the Controlled Substances Act, and approving it for medical use would have represented a major shift.

In a briefing document put together ahead of the meeting, FDA staff raised concerns that although the studies were nominally “double-blinded”—meaning neither those being tested nor their health care workers knew who received the treatment versus the placebo—most people were able to accurately guess what they received.

This “functional unblinding,” they argued, introduces bias and uncertainty into study outcomes.

FDA staff also criticized Lykos for not gathering sufficient side effect data, including whether participants experienced  “euphoria” or “elated mood,” which, they argued, “would be informative for an assessment of abuse potential or characterization of anticipated effects of the drug.”

Reports from recreational use suggest MDMA has harmful impacts on heart and liver health—but the company did not gather enough data in these areas, the FDA said.